And today is
World Freedom Day
We usually take our freedom to live our lives the way that we
want for granted, but this day is designed for us to think about those who
aren’t even allowed to voice their opinions publicly.
We think that all this is happening somewhere else. Somewhere where a dictatorship is in charge, a place where people are oppressed by the state and mindnumbed into submission. Not here, not in this England of ours; after all we are a civilised country.
But think carefully on this day, think about what freedom means to you. Think about your freedom of speech, and thought, and law abiding action, because increasingly inBritain
these rights, along with may others, are being eroded.
We think that all this is happening somewhere else. Somewhere where a dictatorship is in charge, a place where people are oppressed by the state and mindnumbed into submission. Not here, not in this England of ours; after all we are a civilised country.
But think carefully on this day, think about what freedom means to you. Think about your freedom of speech, and thought, and law abiding action, because increasingly in
Once it was believed that freedom of speech was a right
given by God (or some other such figure) to the British. Men and women would
stand on soapboxes at Speaker’s Corner and talk, preach and blather about
anything they liked without fear of prosecution, unless of course the police
considered they were being treasonous or profane. In reality Speaker’s Corner
was no more immune from the law of the land than any other place, but the
police allowed a degree of outspokenness.
You’ll notice that I’m speaking in the past tense here. Over
the last twenty years or so our civil liberties, including freedom of speech,
have been eroded and continue to be closed down. Recent decades have seen a
dramatic decline in our hard won civil liberties which include freedom of
speech, but there is much, much more at stake.
We are now more observed and monitored than at any other
time in our history. Every word we write, every word we speak on our phones can
be monitored. It started back in Thatcher’s time with the Interception of
Communications Act which gave permission for phone tapping. But it
was Blair who oversaw a massive roll out in surveillance under the pretense
that it was the only way to win his fictitious ‘war on terror’.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act allows the
government full surveillance powers over all communications and the bugging of
phones, spying, and the interception of communications. It allows the
police, intelligence services, HM Revenue and Customs and hundreds of other
public bodies (including local authorities) to demand the handing over of telephone,
internet and postal information including name and address, phone calls made
and received, source and destination of emails, internet browsing information
and mobile phone positioning data that records user’s location. It’s very open
to abuse; some local authorities have used it to check that people aren’t
cheating their school place allocation system.
We are constantly watched by cameras, they are on every
corner and often hidden or disguised. How can they be to protect us if the
authorities don’t want us to know they are there? They are simply watching and
monitoring. There were no cameras when I was growing up and Britain has
gone from zero to over 4 million CCTV cameras in just a few
decades. We have a higher number of cameras than China but
despite all this surveillance there is less than one arrest per
day as a result of CCTV footage. I know it’s a cliché but Big Brother is
here, albeit a little later than predicted.
Thatcher’s Public Order Act of 1986 (as a result on the
miner’s strikes) made it law that, in order to be lawful, protest organisers
give police six days advance notice of their action. Since then
successive governments have quietly upgraded the Act to dumb down our right to protest
peacefully. This move to stop us protesting, striking, or even complaining
continues under David Cameron’s new reign of terror and increasingly protesters
are subjected to stop and search, kettling, and snatch and grab arrests by
an increasingly armed and militarised police force, with the emphasis being on
force.
Before 1984, you could not be held by police for longer
than 24 hours without a criminal charge being made against you. Thatcher
extended this to four days, Blair to seven, then to 14 days, and
then finally sought the power to detain citizens without charge for up to
90 days. Blair was defeated on 90 days, but did manage to increase the time
without charge to 28 days.
Any of us can be electronically tagged at any time under Control
Orders passed in the Terrorism Act of 2006. This means that anybody
suspected of terrorist related activities by the Home Secretary can be electronically
tagged, monitored, restricted from making phone calls and using the internet,
banned from some kinds of work, restricted in their movement, have their passport
revoked and be ordered to report to the police - and all of this without any
type of trial.
We are increasing trapped into towing the party line
regardless of who the party is. As a result of all of this, more and more people
are being arrested and taken to court for simply saying what they think or
showing their dissent. Recent incidents include the convictions
of Critical Mass protest riders for cycling on the evening of the
opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympics, and Bethan Tichbourne who
was arrested and convicted for shouting ‘Cameron has blood on his hands’ (which
of course he has) when he turned on the Christmas lights in her hometown.
It seems we could be now living in a police state where
every thought and opinion we have is monitored and measured against any number
of yardsticks including racism, religion, terrorism and of course all the
‘isms’ associated with this ridiculous PC world we have created. There is no
room for dissent, no room for questions, and no room for difference. We are
just a few steps away from the enforced groupthink of North Korea ,
and the Ministry of Truth and the reality of thoughtcrime is with us in all but
name.
We ignore the erosion of our rights at our peril. With the
current government wanting to abolish the Human Rights Act and ongoing moves to
obtain access to yet more ‘private’ communications (such as browser histories)
we could soon be facing the final destruction of what few civil liberties we
have left. It is time to pay attention.
Perhaps World Freedom Day is the day to start doing just
that.
Clare Pritchard on FB
ReplyDeleteYes, very true and articulate as ever Andrew, i won't be silenced...It' a right old mess...but people have to keep on saying their piece...
Andrew Height
DeleteMy concern Clare is that increasingly we have legislation that says if we keep saying what we think then we can be in breach of the law. For instance i believe that Tony Blair is a war criminal and should be tried as such. That young woman was imprisoned for saying that Cameron has blood on his hands - which he does. At some point totalitarian governments seek to control the views of the people though fear. We are at that point.
Clare Pritchard
ReplyDeleteYes, i have heard of people that have been much more how shall we say politically vocal and active, that have been infiltrated in their own homes, ie by a member of the undercover authorities...Well they will have to have the jails at maximum capacity..
Clare Pritchard
ReplyDeleteProbably squeeze a few more thousand in...
Andrew Height
ReplyDeleteIt could be hundreds of thousands in the not too distant future.
Clare Pritchard
ReplyDeleteDo you know how long the young lady got sentenced for and what she was actually charged with??? Just a matter of interest???
Andrew Height
ReplyDeleteNo. But I don't see that as the issue, She now has a police record. Never great if you want to get a new job.
Clare Pritchard
ReplyDeleteAgreed, but was just curious..
Clare Pritchard
DeleteI've just googled her and she was fined, and order to pay costs, but as you say, having an opinion has got her a police record..
David Searle on FB
ReplyDeleteAll spot on, but I think you emphasise the role of the government and state too much.
Even more pernicious are the outrage vigilantes and mobs that seek to shut down anyone they disagree with online, at public meetings and in universities.
DeleteThe group think of these mobs has captured a generation who now believe in "safe spaces" where views which oppose today's orthodoxies cannot be spoken, and censorship is the best preemptive way to prevent offence being caused. They will use anyone in authority including the police to do their bidding.
These orthodoxies curtail genuine debate is wide swathes of politics and social affairs. There are contradictions everywhere but even highlighting them is becoming dangerous and not just because of state surveillance.
Unlike · Reply · 3 · 9 November at 20:40
Clare Pritchard
DeleteI saw something on one of the left wing women groups only the other day in a cornish town i think it was, where a member of the public questioned one of the councillors about an important point and got removed by the heavies...
DeleteAndrew Height
You are probably right David, I do tend to oversimplify the issues. i think we have basic solidarity though wink emoticon
DeleteDavid Searle
http://dailybruin.com/.../free-tampons-would-slow-flow.../
Great example in the editors note/apology at the top of this article of the utter nonsense and contradictions the current group think is creating. The fear of causing even the slightest offence is real...
Zoey Freedman: Free tampons would slow flow of gender inequality | Daily…
DAILYBRUIN.COM
I hope that my blog tonight doesn't get me arrested.
ReplyDeleteSarah Rawden, Val Wynne, Kate Fox and 6 others like this.
Tim Preston
Is it something to do with your past life as a Whitehall rent boy?
Lindsey
Messenger Oooo this sounds interesting!!!
Andrew Height
it is interesting, but worrying.
Clare Pritchard
I look forward to it...x
Andrew Height
I think you may find it particularly interesting Clare.
Clare Pritchard
Cheers love x
Paul Whitehouse
Columbian marching powder induced YP ads?
Clare Pritchard
Not the cuts in Mental Health in Mcr per chance???
Andrew Height
Nope
Carmel Payne on FB
ReplyDeleteGreat piece of writing as usual. However, when we were growing up Andy all we worried about was the IRA, if we worried at all that is? It was my parents (not sure about yours ) I would over-hear discussing the terrors in Northern Ireland, I just carried on eating my stew around the dinner table half listening.
Sadly, we now have to deal with considerably more atrocities around the world ( 9/11, Tunisian beach massacre and many more. ) Having said that, nothing annoys me more than browsing the Internet for whatever, shoes, clothes etc, only to find over the next few days I am bombarded with trivia from the sites I've visited!!
So yes, it is worrying to be besieged by the forces that be and I often wonder how much do THEY know about me? Not that I'm particularly fascinating of course.
As for you being arrested, I don't think so, not yet anyway. They're too busy sitting on their backsides tracking their monitors and taking notes. Your days are numbered though.
Andrew Height
DeleteGood points, well made. But the IRA were on our doorstep always. By our governments actions we have invited this new breed of terrorists to attack us. My point is wider than terrorism though. iour universities are dumbing down there debates and if somebody makes a complaint against something you have said or written, as has happened to me, you could get a threatening phone call from the police - again as has happened to me. Police states and totalitarian governments thrive on fear and complicity. I'm sure that you don't want Charlie or Grace to hold no opinions other than those okayed by the state.
Clare Pritchard
DeleteI'm sure we all want our children to be free thinkers...
DeleteCarmel Payne
Of course not! I knew you were looking at the wider picture Andy but didn't have time to write more. Really enjoyed this blog, thanks!
Andrew Height
DeleteThanks Carmel. We really must stand for the freedom of our children to say what they think and do what they believe.
Andrew Height
ReplyDeleteHere you go Clare. Even sadder and more damning that i thought.
http://www.theguardian.com/.../activist-shocked...
Andrew Height
DeleteSo tell me, just what is an activist? Is it someone who disagrees with the accepted norm? Fuck, I am fucked then.
Clare Pritchard
DeleteFuck knows, we're all for the high jump then...
Clare Pritchard
DeleteMakes me cringe ... to cause upset to Cameron, jeezus the amount of heartbreak that man and his cronies have caused..