Tuesday, 13 November 2012

£6.6 million...


Sorry, I’ve tried leave it alone, but I can’t, so… that John Lewis Christmas ad.

Yes, the one with the two snow people, the one that tells the heartrending story of a snowman who goes in search of a perfect present for his snow person partner, the one with a little girl wistfully looking out of the window, the one that I have heard described on Facebook and other places as cute, and awesome, and lovely, and sweet.

Yes, the one that cost £6.6 million to make.

£6.6 million?

Yes, £6.6 million.

£6.6 million… how?

Well, firstly it was shot in New Zealand where, despite there being no John Lewis, there is snow around at the time they made the ad, not quite enough, but it was easy (if costly) to ship in a few snow machines then tickle it up by computer. Then of course there were the helicopters to transport the Styrofoam snowman, one of many that they used in the ad, to the top of a snowy mountain. That CGI robin probably cost a few quid, and the cost of shipping British road signs and a telephone box (which can hardly be found these days in Britain) to Auckland to make it look authentically British, can’t have come cheap

And, and, and… well, that’s just about it – over six and a half million quid well spent.

Well, I for one don’t think a few sugar-wrapped, twee, shamelessly sentimental, and (dare I say it?) slushy, ooo’s and arrr’s is in any way worth all that money. Besides, the ad is dull and predictable. Better that the snowman had found his love melted into a pool of water on his return. Better still if John Lewis had given the money to charity and then advertised the fact simply and as cheaply as possible on our screens for thirty seconds. That would have grabbed viewer and media attention just as well, and it would have been totally unexpected.

£6.6 million would have given every homeless person in Britain a place to sleep, a decent Christmas dinner, and even a pair of shoes this Christmas. It would have bought an awful lot of toys and treats for thousands of parentless kids. It could have done something for people in various states of ill health in hospitals all over the country, maybe even paid for a few operations. It might have heated quite a few pensioners’ homes for the Christmas holidays, maybe saved a few dying from hypothermia. The money would have bought an awful lot of schoolbooks, even kept a few more libraries open for a while. Need I go on?

Listen, I’m no Bob Geldolf, but John Lewis should hang their fucking heads in shame; they claim to be corporately socially responsible and then spend this huge sum of money to advertise a stupid beret, a pair of gloves and a scarf.

So stop billing and cooing at this silly seasonal nonsense. I hope that when you next see that ad you think about what all that money might have achieved. It isn’t cute, or awesome, or lovely, or sweet – it’s a criminal waste.

My advice – other department stores and shops are available, use them instead.


10 comments:

  1. Well that go people going...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Colin Tickle you mean like this.... I for one had only heard vague whispers about some supermarket not having a tv ad but have heard loads of people mention John Lewis.

    http://m.marketingmagazine.co.uk/article/1158156/John-Lewis-smarts-implied-criticism-Waitrose-charity-ad

    John Lewis smarts at 'implied criticism' in Waitrose charity ad - Marketing news - Marketing magazin
    www.marketingmagazine.co.uk
    John Lewis smarts at 'implied criticism' in Waitrose charity ad marketing news. ...See more
    11 hours ago · Unlike · 2 · Remove Preview

    Cloe Fyne While I don't disagree, I do work in marketing and have to say that this spend is no different to millions of other companies. It's just that this one is publicised for some reason! In fact, in my role, we pride ourselves on the marketing spend......it's what gets product listings!!! Not necessarily right but true! Wonder how much the yellow pages ads used to cost in relative terms for the time.....
    11 hours ago · Like

    Neil Barrett If anything like this annoys you, just think" Bankers "Everything else pales into insignificance.
    11 hours ago · Like · 1

    Sharon Taylor Andrew - there was no need to use the F word, you have a much bigger vocabulary than that.
    11 hours ago · Unlike · 1

    Andrew Height Yes Cloe - of course I get it. But those John Lewis bunch are so holy about it all - and I'd say just because you work in advertising or even marketing it doesn't justify anything. Still, I admire your defence.
    11 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height Ah, but Sharon, people who think this type of mealy-mouthed simpering, pandering to their sentimental and childish notions of what is 'adorable' need to fucking wake up.
    11 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height Neil... don't get me started on bankers.
    11 hours ago · Like

    ReplyDelete

  3. Cloe Fyne Not a defence and I'm not justifying! It's just the truth. Sadly
    10 hours ago · Like

    Sharon Taylor I will say it again - use your wealth of words - you are losing the argument by swearing, but do tell what John Lewis did to you to make you hate them so much?
    10 hours ago · Like

    Glynne T Kirkham No matter how much it cost. It's a bobbins advert.
    10 hours ago · Unlike · 1

    Kevin Parrott It's their advert Andy, they have great well trained staff, superb stores, great service, quality products, it's their money,
    they aren't a charity.
    I didn't hear you complain about JR Hartley or James Nesbitt, or whatever The Ramones & Phil Spector were paid for the use of 'Baby I Love You' in the YP TV advert.
    John Lewis have about 40 stores and employ a lot of people, so the budget for their advert works out at about £150,000 per store. Not bad.
    Small fry compared to what some of our big insurance & drain companies spent in YP giving the likes of you & me a good living.
    10 hours ago · Edited · Unlike · 2

    Sharon Hutt As a marketeer I was going to write exactly what Cloe said. It is a lot of money, the cost of course includes all the fees to ITV etc for the ad slots. And the trade it will bring keeps a lot of people in employment. This ad really gladdened my heart my heart I'm afraid and made me feel really Christmassy.
    10 hours ago · Like · 1

    Mike King Pretty much what everyone else said. JL is a superb store and at least they pay tax here which is a lot better than some other retailers. I enjoy the sentimentality of it all and I don't want to f@cking wake up - life is far too miserable ( as you often point out in your blogs ). If you want to campaign then moan at Starbucks or the sheer waste of food and resources by Heston on Channel 4.
    9 hours ago · Edited · Like

    Lorna Gleadell Waste of money................Abu Qatada............OUR MONEY !!!!!
    9 hours ago · Like

    ReplyDelete

  4. Andrew Height I love blogging. I can say what I think and I'm happy to accept the consequences. A couple of points on this though: John Lewis are a superb organisation who deliver better than most companies on what they promise. Unfortunately if you read their policy on corporate social responsibility then they blew it with this ad. I don't hate them or their advertising, actually I've been impressed with how they have pushed the boundaries of advertising on in the last few years (they never used to advertise at all on TV until 2007). Unfortunately though, this is a piss poor ad that cost a hundred times more than it is worth. It is aimed at airheads who think snowmen are cute and to be honest Raymond Briggs did it so much better. The only winners here are the ad agency who thought "I quite fancy New Zealand" - I know because I have been there (although we always tried for Barbados). If you can be bothered to check out the name of the agency you'll just know that they are taking the piss. Ads that cost this much money usually have huge celebs fronting it (perfume ads mainly), this has a couple of crappy fake snowmen. As for my time at YP and the YP ads - who gives a fuck? I'll state my case again: this shitty ad isn't worth the spend and with John Lewis' stance on SCR they should hang their fucking heads in shame. Not only were they ripped off, they've hurt their otherwise squeaky clean reputation; and as for the marketeers... well, they are paid to polish turds. My blog, my views, but thanks for commenting and I hope that I can make you think (one way or another) again soon.
    9 hours ago · Edited · Like

    Mike King I've just read it and cannot really see what they have done wrong - I think with this is probably your interpretation of their policy. If you are happy to accept the consequences would admitting you were maybe a little harsh be unfair? ;) <- note smiley.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height There's a chap down our pub Mike that could have made that ad for five hundred quid... that's all I'm saying :-)(by the way you read the short version).
    8 hours ago · Like

    Mike King As someone else has pointed out it's merely 150k per store which is the square root of bugger all in the scheme of things. Bah Humbug Mr Scrooge
    8 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height We will agree to differ Mike, I'm okay with that. Snowmen and gloves... how fucking brilliant is that. Well done Adamandeveddb - yes, you really are taking the piss aren't you.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Mike King You miss the point, yeah sure it's snowmen and gloves. but it's the whole story and it's just a nice piece of escapism with the ahh factor. Maybe you need to watch it or do something you're language is terrible this evening Andrew - you really are a grumpy old cus ;) Let's agree to disagree - I've got to do some Christmas shopping and need to work out what I need to buy in JL.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height ;-) let's just say it's the power of love Mike.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Mike King Cleaning my soul - clearing my wallet morelike ;) I've nearly been lynched by my twin sis for saying I actually quite liked the version on the advert.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height and she's right... but that is another John Lewis Pavlov dog story... ;-)
    8 hours ago · Like

    Kevin Parrott Andy, you're an airheadist.
    7 hours ago · Unlike · 2

    Andrew Height Thanks Kevin, I may need to look that one up.
    A few seconds ago · Like

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andrew Height Well that brightened up an otherwise dull evening.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Gosh, I got some flak over that John Lewis thing and how I think that their new ad shows poor judgement. I'm rather pleased that I didn't take a swipe at the BBC now - now there's an institution whose judgement can be trusted..
    Like · · Unfollow post · Promote

    Nick Jones Ah but you don't have to watch expensively produced, mind-numbing ads on BBC channels.
    58 minutes ago via mobile · Like

    Cloe Fyne Healthy debate is good for the soul!
    51 minutes ago via mobile · Like

    Jill Nelmes Looks like you got the desired reaction Andrew!
    32 minutes ago · Like

    Andy Danger Bickerdike I did like the idea of coming back to a puddle..
    6 minutes ago · Like

    Andrew Height :-) I think I may take an easier option tonight.
    A few seconds ago · Like

    ReplyDelete
  7. Linda Kemp on FB
    They should be forced to put the production costs on all ads, just so we know! One of those tiny messages that make no sense unless you watch carefully...... Didn't comment yesterday, but I'm with you Andi x

    ReplyDelete

  8. Nick Jones Ah but you don't have to watch expensively produced, mind-numbing ads on BBC channels.
    9 hours ago via mobile · Like

    Cloe Fyne Healthy debate is good for the soul!
    9 hours ago via mobile · Like

    Jill Nelmes Looks like you got the desired reaction Andrew!
    9 hours ago · Like

    Andy Danger Bickerdike I did like the idea of coming back to a puddle..
    8 hours ago · Like

    Andrew Height :-) I think I may take an easier option tonight.
    8 hours ago · Like

    Linda Kemp They should be forced to put the production costs on all ads, just so we know! One of those tiny messages that make no sense unless you watch carefully...... Didn't comment yesterday, but I'm with you Andi x
    8 hours ago · Unlike · 1

    Mike King To err us human and I'd certainly rather have a generally trustworthy but flawed bbc than try and get my news from the commercial mob. It would end up like the states with different political groups watching different channels.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

    Cloe Fyne Should we put prices of magazine ads, product design, in store marketing, cost of product listings etc on too then?? Same principle different medium!!!! Truth is marketing in any form is very costly. Not saying its right but it's true. Hey let's go the whole hog and put margins on products.......that'd stop us from buying wouldn't it!?????
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 2

    Kevin Parrott Now Andy, I would have been with you all the way if you'd vented on BBC news. It should actually be BBBC news, one of the Bs standing for bias.
    That's a given, without doubt!
    7 hours ago · Edited · Like

    Cloe Fyne Or bast@rds!!! Ha ha ha
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like

    Sharon Hutt Having been away I hadn't seen the Waitrose ad until this morning. I still like the JL ad but do now feel its hypocritical for one part of the company to denounce big budgets, whilst the other clearly doesnt. Typical big business where everyone is working in silos with different objectives. Marketing fail.
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

    Lynda Pasquarello Henderson 'F' em Andi, you are free to post whatever you like.
    2 hours ago · Like

    Maggie Patzuk Hi Andrew Height - just seeing this in the US! I totally agree with you! Personally, seeing a big budget, overdone commercial has never convinced me to patronize a business. Quite the contrary, actually! And as for your choice of words - you write the way you speak, and that's perfectly fine with me! It's a sweet pleasure to read your posts and hear your voice in my head! :) Keep it up - we need more honest observations like yours!!!!!
    about an hour ago · Like

    Andrew Height i'm not usually so potty-mouther at least when I write, but sometimes that word needs to be used.
    A few seconds ago · Like

    ReplyDelete
  9. Andrew Height Hey Cloe - I think your suggestion is great. I wonder if the public realise just how much of what they buy and the cost is due to the cost of hype?
    2 hours ago · Like

    Richard Shore You're getting more like a communist every day
    about an hour ago · Like

    Kevin Parrott I have a great idea..............
    Let's all stop buying anything & everything; just think of all the money we'd save.
    Hang on a minute, none of us would have any money as the economy would grind to a halt.
    about an hour ago · Like

    Andrew Height Come the revolution Number 2 I expect you to be there with me on the barricades comrade.
    about an hour ago · Like

    Andrew Height That's an extreme view Kevin ;-). The economy didn't grind to a halt before advertising came along, actually trade was very healthy. I'm not suggesting that companies stop advertising, I'm just asking then to stop wasting so much money on shite (as Mr Shore would call it).
    about an hour ago · Like

    Kevin Parrott Yes Andy, I agree with you. I was just being silly, however.................. (Wikipedia)
    Egyptians used papyrus to make sales messages and wall posters. Commercial messages and political campaign displays have been found in the ruins of Pompeii and ancient Arabia. Lost and found advertising on papyrus was common in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Wall or rock painting for commercial advertising is another manifestation of an ancient advertising form, which is present to this day in many parts of Asia, Africa, and South America. The tradition of wall painting can be traced back to Indian rock art paintings that date back to 4000 BC. History tells us that Out-of-home advertising and billboards are the oldest forms of advertising.
    10 minutes ago · Like

    Andrew Height Yes Kevin, I wrote that. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. B. Kapral
    went to tesco's where it was Christmas, Happy Holidays, Eid, Hanukah, etc. Load of crap. I hate that John lewis ad - and now you've told me what it cost I am spitting mad! bah humbug - Christmas has lost it's meaning in the main, just a lot of greedy children and adults buying more and more mainly useless stuff. The child next door at age 8 already has an Ipod, mobile phone, x-box and god knows what she will get this year. The family are not even well off, just Dad works and there are four kids, so how they manage I don't know - but anyway does debt matter if your little one (Ugly or otherwise) gets what it wants for 2 seconds without moaning all day. The moaning will come later when they compare what they got with their equally spoilt friends. And yes I did spoil my daughter (and still do if I can) but only with what money I had. I never went into debt over Christmas and still keep a limit on my spends. After all it's the thought that counts - isn't it?

    ReplyDelete